My mind is constantly in the place I could go next, I feel it important to make a durable list of international locations that I am obligated to make my way to within the next ten years (a bold mission I realize.) Places on here have either always been on my list for no apparent reason or have recently been added due to the New York Times news agenda or Travel + Liesure's feature spreads on must-see luxury resorts (oh don't act like a Thai spa treatment doesn't sound attractive to you, liar.) Let's get started on just a few, in no particular order:Abidjan, Ivory Coast.
Like I said, the news agenda plays a pretty critical role in my process of choosing destinations. There's enough tragic publicity daily on this place to bring me to tears, and it has actually, but I can't help but be inspired by the recent turn of events:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/12/world/africa/12ivory.html?_r=1&scp=5&sq=abidjan&st=cse
In this story from last week, we can see that a change has finally come. Gbagbo is gone. Though the effects of his time in power may continue on for some years, the first step has been taken (unless you count the opposition's initial decision to fight as the first step) and now the country can get back on it's feet- economically and politically. The article also stated the involvement of foreign military groups (like France) as aid for the opposition. Information presented in the article was presented in a way commonly used by the new York Times: quotes from big men involved (including Gbagbo and a commander in the French military) sprinkled throughout but it gets to the point immediately. The arrest of Mr. Gbagbo can probably be considered the climax of the story of unrest in the Ivory Coast and the NY Times wasted no times in telling readers exactly what they needed to know in a situation like this. The ultimate message being conveyed in this story is one that I not only agree with, but also an underlying ca
use to why visiting the Ivory Coast is on my to-do list. The message is that now that Gbagbo is gone, the country can move on.For weeks we've been reading about political disaster and internal war, but what we are seeing now are stories of hope. These people, pardon my making assumptions based on what I've read and not directly seen, are the kind that won't let a power-hungry man maintain authority if he doesn't deserve it.
I can only imagine the cries of happiness that resounded after the arrest.
The following is an article by Voice of America news about the forecasted economic recovery under Ouattara:
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/africa/UN-Expects-Swift-Economic-Recovery-in-Ivory-Coast-119858994.html
Let's hope the UN knows what it's talking about.
Dublin, Ireland. This whole thing stems from my father informing me my family roots are somewhere in the British Isles about seven years ago. Who knows if it's true; I don't come from a particularly heritage-informed family. Even then, though, I made the decision to go see "where I come from" (an obvious excuse to go some place new- as if someone needs an excuse) and experience the compassionate and fun-loving culture that is the Irish. As I have no personal experience on which to base my cultural understanding of this region (my family and I went to London five years ago and that's the closest I've come) I am making some pretty profound assumptions. Regardless of whether or not I am right or wrong, I must go see Dublin: famous for it's coffee-drinking, seven-hours-a-conversation intelectuals, cobble-stone streets and lively pubs. These are the basics I know from articles and books: *Dublin likes to drink.

I'll admit, I got this idea from movies mostly ("P.S. I Love You" played a big part and I'm not ashamed to say it. Okay, maybe a little), but every Dublin travel article I've ever read swears by the pubs and breweries so I'm following suit. Of the the dozens to choose from, there's the world-famous Guiness Storehouse, which was built in 1908 and almost single-handedly ran the economy for hundreds of years. Excuse my frankness, but any city that maintains financial stability through beer must be a light-hearted bunch. *Dublin likes to read.
Sounds dumb, right? What city with any internationally-known university like Trinity wouldn't enjoy a good read? What Dublin has, though, is different. The Archbishop March's Library was built upon a simple cornerstone concept: everyone should have access to books: books on medicine, navigation, math, travel, classic literature and music. From what I've heard, the city continued this theology and has since developed just a few more public libraries.*Dublin likes to talk.

Well who wouldn't with that accent. A friend of mine once told me about her study abroad experience in Dublin. Her descriptions of the locals were mesmerizing: that they were the friendliest, most hospitable, genuine people she'd ever come across. Not to mention they have plenty to talk about given the availability of higher education, the success of local artists, musicians and restaurants.
Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
This has been a growing priority since my freshman year in college. I watched a documentary in my anthropology class about the autrocities of the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot's regime, and just like any other naive girl, I suddenly had to go. I guess I am still naive, because the urge has only heightened since then. Not to mention I am becoming good friends with a lovely lady at my church who spent three years as a missionary in Phnom Penh (and of course remains in contact with people who are still there- guest rooms perhaps?) If there is any spirit or happiness left in these people after that devastating history, I will be in awe.
I do have experience in Southeast Asia, and from what I have seen with my own eyes, Southeast Asians are a beautiful and lovely kind with smiles from one ear to the other. What I want to see when I go (not if; when) is a bright smile on a Cambodian citizen: proof that a selfish and blood-thirsty dictator does not have power over a nation's people once he is gone. People bounce back, and Cambodians can smile after millions of their own are brutally killed, displaced and weakened.This is a New York Times story from April 7th on continued repression and adversity in Cambodia: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/world/asia/08cambodia.html?ref=cambodia
“Over the past 20 years, the development of civil society has been one of Cambodia’s few enduring achievements,” he said. “This law threatens to reverse that progress.”
In the early 1990s, Cambodia emerged from two decades of civil war and mass
killings by the Khmer Rouge, which left the country brutalized, without an educated class or civic institutions."


The two daughters evangelize to everyone they come into contact with (in their perfect Spanish of course), hold separate secular jobs to compensate for a missionary's salary, teach Sunday school, lead powerful worship and even give Sunday morning sermons every we ek. They are building up Mexican disciples who in turn go on to build their own churches. People are getting saved by the dozens weekly. They are fearless because they are p lanted in the Lord's purpose for them, so overwhelming satisfied with the work God has given them in a place they once did not consider home. Now they can't imagine leaving Mexico. I learned many things during my time there, the most significant being that I must keep my eyes and ears open for when God is ready to reveal my life's ministry. It may not be in
international missions- though I would definitely not complain if that be the case- or in pastoral horizons, but I know it will be important for the ultimate Christian goal of every knee bowed and every tongue confessed. I know the calling may not come overnight (though it did for these people) but probably in a sequence of blessings and signs revealed to me over time... at least that's the way God has worked in my life thus far. I also learned of a very interesting lifestyle, which is that of the missionary and the missionary's kids. These people are not constantly covered head to toe, nor do they end every sentence with "Praise God." They are real people: personable and content and ready to spend time with anyone who wants to spend time with them. I love them so dearly, and am so blessed to have their email address. They assured me all I have to do is send an email a day in advance next time I plan on visiting them in Queretaro, and there will be a next time.
As a result of my journey, I came to realize something... There's been a disturbance in the belief system I strongly cling to. It's not recent, in fact I think it has been around much longer than I've been alive, but it's just now starting to bother me. I'm getting really agitated with it. Not necessarily with the people who are doing it but with the concept itself. This concept is tolerance. My tolerant brothers and sisters in Christ, as well as myself since I have become quite a tolerant individual, have the best intentions, and I don't want to come off as a self-righteous, finger-pointing sonofagun with a wrinkled forehead. I don't. But honestly, isn't it better to be that than a confused, semi-heated church-goer who somewhat resembles, if you squint your eyes and tilt your head just so, one of those people who are living with a God-given purpose? I suppose I'm putting myself at risk of hypocrisy because I'm not classified as the gospel-preaching, incredibly well-versed Christian gal with the purest intentions. What I am getting at here has little do with the actions of others and more to do with my individual mentality that we were not made to attend church, go home, create a few "God is great" facebook statuses and call it good. I no longer believe that to be okay for myself or anyone who claim
s to be living for God and fulfilling spiritual purpose. Either you are or you're not. Either God's purpose is being revealed through my life, or it's not. I realized most of this as I roamed the streets of downtown Queretaro (one of the few safe cities left in Mexico) smelling cultural uniqueness and tasting the potential of a revival, a revolution of sorts, stemming from a family's decision to obey God's command.
